About the name of ixml

I first wrote about ixml in 2013. That is 12 years ago.

Since then I have only and always used "ixml". The current spec only uses 
"ixml".
Recently someone made a change to the draft spec using "iXML", and someone 
remarked we should be consistent.

I don't see that as a reason to change the name of ixml after a dozen 
years.

So my plan is to revert iXML back to ixml. I don't think we need a 
discussion at this late stage about changing the name.

Steven

Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2025 10:25:14 UTC