Re: draft agenda for ixml Community Group call, Tuesday 15 November 2022

"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> writes:
> (I seem to have overlooked the email exchange last Tuesday about when we
> next meet; the minutes of 11 October said we agreed to meet on 15
> November, so I have prepared an agenda.  If we prefer to skip this
> month, I'll have a first draft of the agenda for December.)

I’m happy to meet tomorrow. I believe we have regrets from JL.

> ACTION (2022-10-11): Norm to move the erratum from 'Proposed' to
>                      'Accepted'.

Awaiting review, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/157

> ACTION (2022-10-11): Norm to write a proposal that covers the c0 c1
>                      problem in strings

Awaiting review, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/160

> ACTION (2022-10-11): Norm to make XML displayable in all browsers

Awaiting review, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/158

Rendered here: https://ixml.nwalsh.com/branch/minor-ammendments/

ixml: https://ixml.nwalsh.com/branch/minor-ammendments/ixml.ixml.html
xml: https://ixml.nwalsh.com/branch/minor-ammendments/ixml.xml.html

> ACTION (2022-10-11): Norm to inform group how build process will work

Done: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Oct/0014.html

> ****************************************************************
> Topic:  Status reports
> ****************************************************************
>
> Topic:  Status of implementations

Nothing new to report.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica