Re: integrating error codes into the test suite and its schema

> I note that those of us raising errors in XPath based languages will
> probably be throwing errors with QNames. Should implementations prefer
> a standard namespace (or a standard no-namespace)?

I believe that we got agreement that the error codes in the Invisible
XML specification should be in the Invisible XML namespace when they are
reported in a context where a namespace is expected.

That’s what I intend to do in my XProc step, for example, because the
rest of your pipeline is going to be easier to write if you can catch
namespace qualified error codes.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica