- From: Tomos Hillman <yamahito@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:58:49 +0000
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2022 14:59:08 UTC
I agree that it would be worth slipping a delivery date, but not that such a slip would be necessary with some careful scope choices :) _________________ Tomos Hillman eXpertML Ltd +44 7793 242058 On 12 Jan 2022, 13:14 +0000, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, wrote: > Assuming Norms logic is solid. > The one point that strikes a chord with me > (see xml-dev over the last couple of weeks) > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 13:02, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> wrote: > > > 2. It would be better to get them in v1 because we have more-or-less > > complete design freedom today. After we ship v1, there will be a > > natural pressure to not break things. Lots of our current freedoms > > will become more-or-less expensive > > To me this makes perfect sense, to the point where (IMHO) > it would be worth slipping a delivery date. > > Lessons learned from xml 1.0? > > regards > > > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. >
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2022 14:59:08 UTC