- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 21:48:53 +0000
- To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2022 21:49:13 UTC
On Wednesday 05 January 2022 18:34:15 (+01:00), Steven Pemberton wrote: Currently we have "For any conforming grammar and any input, processors must:" and then a list of conformance clauses. It seems to me reasonable that we require that the processor establish that the grammar is conforming first. It is true that it says "A conforming processor must not accept non-conforming grammars." Maybe that is sufficient. So: "For any supplied grammar and input, processors must: * Establish that the grammar is conforming, and report otherwise that it is not. * If the grammar is conforming, parse the input using the grammar, and ..." We also need to decide what conformance criteria for the processor we want to include about non-valid XML names and character content. This point still holds. Steven
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2022 21:49:13 UTC