- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 16:09:27 +0000
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Monday 03 January 2022 16:57:07 (+01:00), C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
> There may be other ways to write the grammar so as to ensure that
> a U+0001 in the input does not end up making it impossible for the
> processor to produce XML output, although I cannot think of any off hand.
> (If we had a way to replace a character with its hex code, I could
> write a grammar to write out a U+0001 character as \u0001 or
> &my-ncr-0001; or <?hex 0001?> or something similar, using a non-standard
> method of escaping that character in an XML context (because there
> is no standard way). But we don’t have that in ixml now and no one
> has suggested it.)
Actually, in the queue is the +"string" proposal:
illegal: -#1, +"<?hex 0001?>";
-#2, +"<?hex 0001?>";
{etc}
Steven
Received on Monday, 3 January 2022 16:09:46 UTC