- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 18:04:32 +0000
- To: "Norm Tovey-Walsh" <norm@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Correct. It is not a context-free language, so it is not possible to solve it in a context-free system. But it is at least possible to solve a large subset of examples, and maybe even all extant examples. Steven On Wednesday 03 August 2022 19:28:34 (+02:00), Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: > Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> writes: > > Hopefully I'm more awake now, and have got it right. The Gedcom > > version, with links, with nesting. > > I think it’s important to observe that this doesn’t solve the problem as > presented, it solves a subset of the problem. It can’t handle nesting > more than 9 nevels and I don’t think ixml can handle arbitrarily deep > nesting. (Though as Steve pointed out, you could scan for the level and > then generate a grammar that had that many levels.) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norm Tovey-Walsh > Saxonica >
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2022 18:04:49 UTC