- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 09:19:16 -0600
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Norm Tovey-Walsh writes: > Hello, > > There are now three different error codes drafts, representing four > different possible approaches to adding error codes to the spec. > > 1. PR #54, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/54 > Rendered at https://ndw.github.io/ixml/errcodes.html > > This draft inlines the error messages into the running prose: > > ... > 2. PR #65, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/65 > Rendered at https://ndw.github.io/ixml/errcodes2.html > > This draft makes the error codes superscripts. ... > 3. PR #74, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/74 > Rendered at https://ndw.github.io/ixml/errcodes3.html > > ... Rather than > placing the error codes in a superscript, it places them > parenthetically. > > ... > 4. PR #74, https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/pull/74 > Rendered at https://ndw.github.io/ixml/errcodes3.html > > This proposal is an extension of proposal 3. In addition to placing > the error codes parenthetically in the prose, it adds the full error > text below the paragraph in which the error(s) occur. ... For what it's worth, I think my preferences are 1 or 4, 3, 2, in that order. Version 1 is tied with version 4. Michael -- C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC http://blackmesatech.com
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2022 15:19:34 UTC