- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 09:11:24 +0100
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2022 08:16:53 UTC
> This is to place on record that I think (b) is the preferable option, > and to invite any members of the CG who agree that (b) is preferable to > collaborate with me to refine the pragmas proposal as an extension > layered over standard ixml. I have already implemented the pragmas proposal, in anticipation that it would become part of the specification. I plan to make it available to users of my processor and am eager to cooperate with other implementors to assure that this add on has the widest possible interoperability. > The CG has not been able to achieve consesus on such rules, so I > propose that we use the Balisage paper on the pragmas proposal to > sketch out a proposal. Yes, absolutely. Using structured comments assures that pragmas are completely compatible with ixml; we should do everything we can to assure that pragmas are interoperable as well! Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh Saxonica
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2022 08:16:53 UTC