- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
 - Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 09:11:24 +0100
 - To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
 - Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
 
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2022 08:16:53 UTC
> This is to place on record that I think (b) is the preferable option,
> and to invite any members of the CG who agree that (b) is preferable to
> collaborate with me to refine the pragmas proposal as an extension
> layered over standard ixml.
I have already implemented the pragmas proposal, in anticipation that it
would become part of the specification. I plan to make it available to
users of my processor and am eager to cooperate with other implementors
to assure that this add on has the widest possible interoperability.
> The CG has not been able to achieve consesus on such rules, so I
> propose that we use the Balisage paper on the pragmas proposal to
> sketch out a proposal.
Yes, absolutely. Using structured comments assures that pragmas are
completely compatible with ixml; we should do everything we can to
assure that pragmas are interoperable as well!
                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm
--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2022 08:16:53 UTC