Re: Updated errors draft

Good;

I don't think they need to be put into a namespace, but I do feel that there needs to be a namespace specified for them to be put into should you wish so to do.

_________________
Tomos Hillman
eXpertML Ltd
+44 7793 242058
On 5 Apr 2022, 11:46 +0100, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, wrote:
> Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com> writes:
> > I don't want them to be mandatory for error codes, but if I'm throwing
> > errors from within XSLT, I'd like a designated namespace that I may
> > use.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> If we had namespaces in ixml, I’d absolutely have proposed to put them
> in a namespace.
>
> When we talked about the error codes briefly last week, or the week
> before, I think Michael expressed the opinion that implementations that
> were generating errors in a context where namespaces made sense would
> probably use the ixml namespace for the error codes.
>
> I think that makes sense and, if the error codes draft achieves
> consensus, we could codify that with a statement that says more-or-less
> what Michael said.
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> Norm Tovey-Walsh
> Saxonica