- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:42:59 +0100
- To: Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2022 10:46:21 UTC
Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com> writes: > I don't want them to be mandatory for error codes, but if I'm throwing > errors from within XSLT, I'd like a designated namespace that I may > use. > > Thoughts? If we had namespaces in ixml, I’d absolutely have proposed to put them in a namespace. When we talked about the error codes briefly last week, or the week before, I think Michael expressed the opinion that implementations that were generating errors in a context where namespaces made sense would probably use the ixml namespace for the error codes. I think that makes sense and, if the error codes draft achieves consensus, we could codify that with a statement that says more-or-less what Michael said. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh Saxonica
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2022 10:46:21 UTC