Re: Grammar allows element content in attributes

Good point.  I’ll do so tomorrow.

_________________
Tomos Hillman
eXpertML Ltd
+44 7793 242058
On 15 Jun 2021, 5:40 PM +0100, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, wrote:
> Is this something that should go into the issues database on github?
>
> https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues
>
> That would help ensure it does not get lost. (I have a vague recollection
> of having discussed this, or at least thought about it, earlier, but I don’t
> remember what if anything we said about it.)
>
> Michael
>
>
> > On 15,Jun2021, at 8:44 AM, Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think there is a problem with the following lines of the IXML grammar:
> > class: @code.
> > code: letter, letter, S.
> >
> >
> > Since the definition of S allows comments as well as whitespaces, wouldn't this allow grammars which have <comment/> elements inside of @code? Would the following work instead?
> > class: @code, S.
> > code: letter, letter.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Tom
> >
> > _________________
> > Tomos Hillman
> > eXpertML Ltd
> > +44 7793 242058
>
> ********************************************
> C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
> Black Mesa Technologies LLC
> cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
> http://www.blackmesatech.com
> ********************************************
>