Re: Grammar allows element content in attributes

Is this something that should go into the issues database on github?

https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues

That would help ensure it does not get lost.  (I have a vague recollection
of having discussed this, or at least thought about it, earlier, but I don’t
remember what if anything we said about it.)

Michael


> On 15,Jun2021, at 8:44 AM, Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think there is a problem with the following lines of the IXML grammar:
> class: @code.
> code: letter, letter, S.
> 
> 
> Since the definition of S allows comments as well as whitespaces, wouldn't this allow grammars which have <comment/> elements inside of @code?  Would the following work instead?
> class: @code, S.
> code: letter, letter.
> 
> Thanks!
> Tom
> 
> _________________
> Tomos Hillman
> eXpertML Ltd
> +44 7793 242058

********************************************
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Black Mesa Technologies LLC
cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
http://www.blackmesatech.com
********************************************

Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2021 16:41:18 UTC