RE: Bulk registration (Re: call for agenda items)

After the proposal was floated on this list first and there was support,
the rest happened behind the scenes.   It all went mostly smoothly.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Martin J. Dürst" [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:19 PM
> To: Dave Thaler
> Cc: Larry Masinter; Peter Saint-Andre; public-iri@w3.org; Jeni Tennison
> (jeni@jenitennison.com)
> Subject: Bulk registration (Re: call for agenda items)
> 
> On 2012/10/23 10:25, Dave Thaler wrote:
> > I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme
> > registrations that Alexey and I did, how well that worked, and what we
> might do next.
> 
> Great to hear that that was successful. Although I think I'm subscribed to all
> relevant mailing lists, I haven't seen any correspondence on this. Do you
> have any pointer, or did all of that go on behind the scenes (which would be
> okay with me, too).
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> 
> > -Dave
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@adobe.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:38 PM
> >> To: Peter Saint-Andre; public-iri@w3.org
> >> Cc: Jeni Tennison (jeni@jenitennison.com)
> >> Subject: RE: call for agenda items
> >>
> >> Two more possible topics for IRI WG meeting in Atlanta:
> >>
> >> * briefly about registerProtocolHandler in HTML5 and its implication
> >> for scheme registration
> >> * about fragment identifiers and I18N (not discussed but alluded to
> >> in "Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions"
> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@adobe.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
> >>> To: Peter Saint-Andre; public-iri@w3.org
> >>> Subject: RE: call for agenda items
> >>>
> >>> Some suggested agenda items:
> >>>
> >>> * Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test
> >>> results, and what additional testing is needed.
> >>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
> >>> corrections to me)
> >>> * Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates
> >>> this time around, at least briefly.
> >>> * We should also talk about plans for convergence with
> >>> http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
> >>>> To: public-iri@w3.org
> >>>> Subject: call for agenda items
> >>>>
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>>
> >>>> There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
> >>>> have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
> >>>> discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
> >>>> the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
> >>>> forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
> >>>> Chris Weber and I can generate a draft agenda.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Peter
> >>>>
> >>>> - --
> >>>> Peter Saint-Andre
> >>>> https://stpeter.im/

> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> >>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAz
> >> DG/
> >>>> es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHvdZSlzWsy
> >>>> =+47t
> >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 19:23:04 UTC