Bulk registration (Re: call for agenda items)

On 2012/10/23 10:25, Dave Thaler wrote:
> I could give a brief report on the bulk third-party URI scheme registrations that Alexey
> and I did, how well that worked, and what we might do next.

Great to hear that that was successful. Although I think I'm subscribed 
to all relevant mailing lists, I haven't seen any correspondence on 
this. Do you have any pointer, or did all of that go on behind the 
scenes (which would be okay with me, too).

Regards,   Martin.

> -Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:38 PM
>> To: Peter Saint-Andre; public-iri@w3.org
>> Cc: Jeni Tennison (jeni@jenitennison.com)
>> Subject: RE: call for agenda items
>>
>> Two more possible topics for IRI WG meeting in Atlanta:
>>
>> * briefly about registerProtocolHandler in HTML5 and its implication for
>> scheme registration
>> * about fragment identifiers and I18N (not discussed but alluded to in "Best
>> Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions"
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@adobe.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:01 PM
>>> To: Peter Saint-Andre; public-iri@w3.org
>>> Subject: RE: call for agenda items
>>>
>>> Some suggested agenda items:
>>>
>>> * Testing: I'd like some time to talk about testing and test results,
>>> and what additional testing is needed.
>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/UriTesting (feel free to update or send
>>> corrections to me)
>>> * Martin and I should review the updates to the documents updates this
>>> time around, at least briefly.
>>> * We should also talk about plans for convergence with
>>> http://url.spec.whatwg.org (based on testing)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:08 PM
>>>> To: public-iri@w3.org
>>>> Subject: call for agenda items
>>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> There's been quite a bit of IRI-related activity of late. If you
>>>> have definite ideas about a topic or document you would like to
>>>> discuss during the IRI WG session at IETF 85 (preferably focused on
>>>> the kind of open issues that require WG interaction to move
>>>> forward), please post to this list in the next few days so that
>>>> Chris Weber and I can generate a draft agenda.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> - --
>>>> Peter Saint-Andre
>>>> https://stpeter.im/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlCEqpYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxclwCgosxu1CYeFHoGQqdNhszAz
>> DG/
>>>> es8An3TJaWI9Mb/jzJzadEHvdZSlzWsy
>>>> =+47t
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 19:19:28 UTC