- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:20:53 +0100
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- CC: public-iri@w3.org
On 2012-03-12 08:10, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > Dear IRI WG, > > I have just submitted a new Internet Draft of our main document, > 3987bis. The main changes are editorial/grammatical fixes and updates to > the references. I strongly suggest your review this version, not -10, > because it has less grammatical errors. > > In case you are interested in the small details, please check the > repository at > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/log/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis, in > particular the updates for revisions @102-@107. An overall diff can be > found at http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt. > > Regards, Martin. > ... References check...: > > Normative References: > ASCII: not checked > ISO10646: not checked > RFC2119: [BEST CURRENT PRACTICE] (-> BCP0014) ok > RFC3491: [PROPOSED STANDARD] obsoleted by RFC5891 > RFC3629: [STANDARD] (-> STD0063) ok > RFC3986: [STANDARD] (-> STD0066) ok > RFC5890: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC5891: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC5892: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC5234: [STANDARD] (-> STD0068) ok > UNIV6: not checked > UTR15: not checked > > Informative References: > draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-02: [2012-03-09 ID-Exists] ok > Candidate Recommendation: document unknown > Duerst97: not checked > draft-ietf-iri-comparison-01: [2012-03-02 IESG] ok > Gettys: not checked > Recommendation: document unknown > RFC2130: [INFORMATIONAL] ok > RFC2141: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC2192: [PROPOSED STANDARD] obsoleted by RFC5092 > RFC2277: [BEST CURRENT PRACTICE] (-> BCP0018) ok > RFC2384: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC2396: [DRAFT STANDARD] obsoleted by RFC3986 > RFC2397: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC2616: [DRAFT STANDARD] ok > RFC2640: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC3987: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > draft-ietf-iri-4395bis-irireg-03: Alternate version available: 04 > RFC5122: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > RFC6055: [INFORMATIONAL] ok > RFC6068: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok > UNIXML: not checked > UTR36: not checked > REC-xlink-20010627: [REC] ok > REC-xml-20081116: document unknown > REC-xmlschema-2-20041028: [REC] ok > REC-xptr-framework-20030325: [REC] ok Note the warning for XML; the proper id is REC-xml-20081126. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 07:21:32 UTC