- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:02:03 -0000
- To: draft-ietf-iri-comparison@tools.ietf.org, masinter@adobe.com
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org
#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison
Comment (by masinter@…):
Alternatively? Consider making this document BCP rather than standards
track, since it basically gives guidance for protocols and applications
needing equivalence, and doesn't directly have a scope of application?
(I'm putting this comment in for completeness since it was in iri-
comparison, but I don't think this is such a great idea ...)
--
------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: masinter@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: comparison | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------+------------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 01:02:27 UTC