[iri] #111: should scheme definitions explicitly define equivalence from iri issue tracker on 2012-03-02 (public-iri@w3.org from March 2012)

From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:58:22 -0000
To: masinter@adobe.com
Cc: public-iri@w3.org
Message-ID: <059.b25006fe886314e523ee97bfacbf065f@trac.tools.ietf.org>

#111: should scheme definitions explicitly define equivalence

 from iri-comparison "todo" list:

 Should 4395bis reference iri-comparison and recommend scheme definitions
 describe equivalence specifically?

-- 
------------------------+-----------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |      Owner:
     Type:  defect      |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major       |  Milestone:
Component:  4395bis     |    Version:
 Severity:  -           |   Keywords:
------------------------+-----------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/111>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 00:58:45 UTC