- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:49:35 -0000
- To: masinter@adobe.com
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org
#96: add definition of terms and introduction to comparison document
Changes (by masinter@…):
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
<section title="Comparison, Equivalence, Normalization and
Canonicalization">
<t>In general, when considering a set of items or strings, there are
several
interrelated concepts. A comparison method determines, between two items
in the
set, their relationship. In particular, a comparison method for
determining
equivalence might result in a determination that two (different) items are
equivalent,
known to be different, or that equivalence isn't determined. </t>
<t> One way to define a comparison for equivalence is to define a
a normalization or canonicalization algorithm. For each item in a set
of equivalent items, one of them could be designated the "normal" or
"canonical" form. </t>
<t>These general concepts are used with IRIs in this document,
and in other circumstances, where a mapping from one sequence of Unicode
characters to another one could be described as a "normalization"
algorithm.</t>
<t> In general, this document tries to stay with the "equivalence" or
"comparison" methods, become some times the mathematical notion of
"normalization" results in forms that ordinary users might not consider
"normal"
in an ordinary sense.
</t>
</section>
--
------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: masinter@… | Owner: masinter@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: comparison | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
------------------------+-------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/96#comment:3>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 00:50:09 UTC