- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:36:28 -0700
- To: public-iri@w3.org
- CC: ted.ietf@gmail.com
On 1/10/12 5:28 PM, iri issue tracker wrote: > #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis > > > Comment (by ted.ietf@…): > > Agree with the general issue, but I propose slightly different language to > resolve it: "reserving the term URN explicitly for the URIs using the > "urn" scheme name ([RFC2141]). This also reserves the string "urn" so > that no IRI scheme with that string may be registered." That looks better. Larry pointed out that we might just want to register 'urn' as a URI/IRI scheme, but it appears that is already effectively done according to the registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html Scheme Description Reference ... urn Uniform Resource Names (click for registry) [RFC2141] Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre http://stpeter.im/
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:37:05 UTC