Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis

#69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis


Comment (by ted.ietf@…):

 Agree with the general issue, but I propose slightly different language to
 resolve it:  "reserving the term URN explicitly for the URIs using the
 "urn" scheme name ([RFC2141]).  This also reserves the string "urn" so
 that no IRI scheme with that string may be registered."

-- 
-------------------------+------------------
 Reporter:  evnikita2@…  |       Owner:
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor        |   Milestone:
Component:  4395bis      |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/69#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:28:55 UTC