Re: canonical form and scheme-specific processing rules for URI/IRI spec from Adam Barth on 2011-06-29 (public-iri@w3.org from June 2011)

From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:28:27 -0700
To: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
Cc: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=iPdb4nZwnJXaB-+JRxV7O6k0OXw@mail.gmail.com>

A (possibly incomplete) list:

data
file
mailto
javascript

Adam


On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net> wrote:
> It was brought up here
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011Jun/0085.html> that
> defining a canonical form in the URI/IRI spec would make sense and be
> useful.  Also, that the definition should include scheme-specific rules for
> a finite list of scheme types.
>
> If this is agreeable with no objections, then what should be included in the
> list of schemes?
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 05:29:38 UTC