- From: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:04:38 -0700
- To: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
It was brought up here <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011Jun/0085.html> that defining a canonical form in the URI/IRI spec would make sense and be useful. Also, that the definition should include scheme-specific rules for a finite list of scheme types. If this is agreeable with no objections, then what should be included in the list of schemes? Best regards, Chris
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 05:04:59 UTC