- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:21:09 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
> Boris: " I can't quite tell what the proposal is here, but<example-of-something-that-is-needed> " > Larry: "There is no way to get<example-of-something-that-is-needed> in<special-situation>" > > <example-of-something-that-is-needed> = > "a resolved URI that can then be pasted into various places as a string and give the expected behavior" > > <special-situation> = > "the content has no uniform interpretation URI" OK.... > My proposal is > Use "thismessage:/" as the base for #fragment URIs independent of base. > > There are SOME places into which "thismessage:/#fragment" can be > pasted as a string and give the expected behavior. > > There are other places where it cannot. However, those places don't work for > content that doesn't have an absolute URI in the first place. OK. So your proposal is that if I copy a same-document link from some document in a browser and paste it into a different browser window it should just fail, right? > Copy/paste of "thismessage:/#fragment" URIs would need to attempt > to turn "thismessage:/" into the actual URI for the document in the case > where the document has a URI. > > Is this clearer? Yep. I believe it's unacceptable due to the issue above. -Boris
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2011 23:22:06 UTC