- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:36:39 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D05CAF7CBC8@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Boris, In your original message (note "same document reference" used for the "original message" link), you say: I can't quite tell what the proposal is here, but copying the href of an <html:a> should give you a resolved URI that can then be pasted into various places as a string and give the expected behavior... whatever that is. Does your proposal pass that test? But of course there no other URI to use to turn that "original message" link into anything other than what I proposed, is there? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: public-iri-request@w3.org [mailto:public-iri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:45 PM To: public-iri@w3.org Subject: Re: same-document references On 6/24/11 5:56 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > would it help if fragment only URIs were to imply an absolute URI of "thismessage:/" rather than the document base, and special-case the translation of "thismessage:/" ? I can't quite tell what the proposal is here, but copying the href of an <html:a> should give you a resolved URI that can then be pasted into various places as a string and give the expected behavior... whatever that is. Does your proposal pass that test? -Boris
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2011 19:37:17 UTC