- From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв) <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:42:40 +0200
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- CC: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>, chris@lookout.net, duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp, masinter@adobe.com, public-iri@w3.org
09.12.2011 20:37, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > <hat type='individual'/> > > On 11/16/11 7:00 PM, iri issue tracker wrote: >> #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes >> >> >> Comment (by duerst@…): >> >> Moved from #106 (duplicate): >> >> The reason is that there were no actual usages. But now, there is a use >> (see http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/com-eventbrite- >> attendee), as reported at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri- >> review/current/msg01548.html. >> >> I guess we should restore this text. > Seems fine to me. Well, I really think there is no point in distinguishing between some vendor schemes and other schemes, as it's done with media types. I think developing and registering the scheme according to usual naming rules should be fine in this case. So my proposal remains the same. Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > Peter >
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2011 05:42:15 UTC