- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:41:33 -0700
- To: public-iri@w3.org
- CC: dthaler@microsoft.com
<hat type='individual'/> On 11/16/11 7:15 PM, iri issue tracker wrote: > #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations > > Section 4 (Guidelines for Provisional URI/IRI Scheme Registration) allows > registration by third parties (even if not > on behalf of those who created the scheme). While many of the required > pieces of information are "SHOULD"s, it says: > "A valid Security Considerations section, as required by Section 6 > of [RFC5226]." > > If the third party does not have access to the spec (e.g., because it's > owned by an SDO or company without an open spec), the third party may not > be able to write a "valid" security considerations section. I ran into > this personally. > > Need to either make it a SHOULD, or else clarify what is needed in a > "valid" section. As I recall from the meeting in Taipei, we decided that it was valid to say "unknown, use at your own risk". Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 18:42:09 UTC