- From: Abdulrahman I. ALGhadir <aghadir@citc.gov.sa>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:42:33 +0300
- To: "Slim Amamou" <slim@alixsys.com>, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-iri@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0F9C0B65969D644EA7B34DF381465F660153A4B5@RY02MAIL.citc.gov.sa>
Well numbers (arabic/english) have same common things and mostly direction but IRI adapted English as it base with this isn’t “universal” From: public-iri-request@w3.org [mailto:public-iri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Slim Amamou Sent: 26/May/2010 10:38 AM To: Ted Hardie Cc: public-iri@w3.org Subject: Re: Requirement for internal direction changes (was Re: [bidi] Re: Special ordering for BIDI URLs) On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: (...) One discussion point that I seem to recall touched on a context in which the local language was right-to-left but numbers appearing within the text using Hindu-Arabic numerals (0-9) were left-to-right. This is always the case in all RTL languages, digits order in numbers notation is universally LTR (leftmost digit yields the biggest power of ten) IRIs should be as universal as numbers. -- Slim Amamou | سليم عمامو http://alixsys.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This message and its attachment, if any, are confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and delete this message and its attachment, if any, from your system. You should not copy this message or disclose its contents to any other person or use it for any purpose. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC). CITC accepts no liability for damage caused by this email.
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 07:44:13 UTC