- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:41:26 +0900
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, public-iri@w3.org
Hello Julian, Can you be more specific about how the tracker and the version repository (SVN) are used together (at least as far as the HTTP WG goes)? Is there some coupling between the tracker and SVN? Or has this to be done manually? Is there some coupling between the tracker and the mailing list, or has this to be done manually? If manually, who does? Regards, Martin. On 2010/03/24 8:14, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 14.03.2010 23:29, Larry Masinter wrote: >> >> >> In preparation for the F2F meeting, I took some of the issues open and >> under discussion >> >> and put them into the IRI working group issue tracker. >> >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1 >> >> Please review, comment, update, add additional pointers and >> considerations, >> >> and/or discuss here. >> ... > > Hi Larry, > > thanks for that. > > Having the actual issues properly defined and tracked is a very good > first step. We've been using this a lot in httpbis (I think we were the > first WG using tools.ietf.org for source code control and issue > tracking), and have been very happy with this so far. Every WG should be > using this (or something equivalent). > > Best regards, Julian > > -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 08:42:21 UTC