- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:42:44 -0800
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
> I'm assuming this is intended as a Change Proposal for ISSUE-56 urls- > webarch (mentioning that so the tracker finds it). Yes, the "HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL" was addressed to http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56 > My understanding of this proposal is that you'd like the proposed > changes to be made once the IRI Working Group forms and has a draft > with all the necessary definitions. If that understanding is correct, > then I think we should take up this proposal once those preconditions > have been met. If I have misunderstood, then please clarify. No. Waiting for preconditions would create an unfortunate and unnecessary deadlock. The current internet draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-07 is sufficient to consider the HTML WG proposal now. Any definition thought "necessary" and not contained in -07 should be treated as an issue/change proposal to it. draft-duerst-iri-bis-07 is the proposed starting point of the IRI working group, and changes or additions should be made as the result of participation, discussion and consensus on the public-iri@w3.org mailing list, including the participation of members of the browser vendor and broader HTML community. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 14:43:27 UTC