- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:35:01 +0900
- To: public-iri@w3.org
I have fixed this in my internal copy. I have also added this to the issues list, but I discovered that I had issue 103 already assigned. I have updated the issues list (and the page overall) at http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#tentatively. The deadline for new Internet-Drafts is next Monday, so I'm going to see how much I can get done until then. Regards, Martin. At 17:34 07/06/04, Martin Duerst wrote: > >This is an issue that I have detected while cleaning up my old XML >version of http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri-11.txt >to make it as close to RFC 3987 as possible. > >For reasons that I don't want to spend the time to reconstruct, >the RFC uses the word(?) "syntaxical" when it clearly should be >"syntactical". I propose to fix this without further discussion. > >I'm also thinking about submitting this as an erratum to the RFC >editor. > >Regards, Martin. > > >#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University >#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 05:46:09 UTC