Re: New issue 106 (was 103): syntaxical -> syntactical

I have fixed this in my internal copy. I have also added this to
the issues list, but I discovered that I had issue 103 already assigned.

I have updated the issues list (and the page overall) at
http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#tentatively.
The deadline for new Internet-Drafts is next Monday, so
I'm going to see how much I can get done until then.

Regards,   Martin.

At 17:34 07/06/04, Martin Duerst wrote:
>
>This is an issue that I have detected while cleaning up my old XML
>version of http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri-11.txt
>to make it as close to RFC 3987 as possible.
>
>For reasons that I don't want to spend the time to reconstruct,
>the RFC uses the word(?) "syntaxical" when it clearly should be
>"syntactical". I propose to fix this without further discussion.
>
>I'm also thinking about submitting this as an erratum to the RFC
>editor.
>
>Regards,    Martin.
>
>
>#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
>#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 05:46:09 UTC