- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:34:56 +0900
- To: public-iri@w3.org
This is an issue that I have detected while cleaning up my old XML version of http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri-11.txt to make it as close to RFC 3987 as possible. For reasons that I don't want to spend the time to reconstruct, the RFC uses the word(?) "syntaxical" when it clearly should be "syntactical". I propose to fix this without further discussion. I'm also thinking about submitting this as an erratum to the RFC editor. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 08:35:19 UTC