W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 13:03:35 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org
Cc: Michel Suignard <michelsu@microsoft.com>

For the record, I'm entirely satisfied with this response.


At 18:13 12/05/04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Hello Graham,
>I have listed this as issue normRef-33.
>At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>I think RFC2119 should appear under Normative references, not Informative.
>>I don't know about this, but should [UNIV4] and [UNI9] be normative?
>They are referenced in a normative sentence in the bidi section, so
>yes, fixed. I guess we could move [UNIV4] out of that, if we really
>want (our reference practice seems to lean towards ISO 10646,
>rather than Unicode).
>Michel, what do you think? Can you have a look at it?
>I guess the reference to 10646 may also need updating,
>can you give me the newest version?
>Regards,    Martin.

Graham Klyne
For email:
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 09:26:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:31 UTC