- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 18:13:20 +0900
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, public-iri@w3.org
- Cc: Michel Suignard <michelsu@microsoft.com>
Hello Graham, I have listed this as issue normRef-33. At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: >References > >I think RFC2119 should appear under Normative references, not Informative. Done. >I don't know about this, but should [UNIV4] and [UNI9] be normative? They are referenced in a normative sentence in the bidi section, so yes, fixed. I guess we could move [UNIV4] out of that, if we really want (our reference practice seems to lean towards ISO 10646, rather than Unicode). Michel, what do you think? Can you have a look at it? I guess the reference to 10646 may also need updating, can you give me the newest version? Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 05:27:49 UTC