- From: Chris Riley <me@mchrisriley.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 08:02:03 -0800
- To: Sebastian Lasse <mail@sebastianlasse.de>
- Cc: public-interop-remedies@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEPPcYDYn1pOyRAmzGK=HCP+XC1-XcdMazL9zDEV=XcAftNT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Sebastian! From my perspective, there's a ton of value in developing a sort of federated trust/values signal that could be part of this as well - but that's an ambitious exercise in its own right, and able to be considered separately rather than necessarily as a component of a third-party recsys. No reason why we couldn't have parallel efforts tackling them together as there's a lot of value in the pairing of the two. Does that make sense? On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 2:27 AM Sebastian Lasse <mail@sebastianlasse.de> wrote: > > > … specifically, recommendation systems that we could plug in between the > user and platform service providers to give greater agency to end users > with respect to social, search, etc. > > > wanted to add that “giving greater agency to end users with respect to > social” could also mean (e.g. for W3C recommendation ActivityPub) to move > from collective blocklist to > passlist approaches. > Cristina DeLisle said “when you as an admin were peering with another > instance you are showing your set of values, and if that other instance > believes that they are sharing those values, that instance can peer with > you” > > So maybe we can discuss the “showing your set of values” also for > recommendation systems … > > >
Received on Monday, 7 February 2022 16:10:35 UTC