- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:54:05 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, public-interop-remedies@w3.org
On 2021-12-06 02:29, Mark Nottingham wrote: > 2) Where we want to react to a such a proposal made elsewhere (e.g., > when a competition regulator or other national body selects > something) > (…) > #2 requires us to wait -- I'm not aware of any current, concrete > proposals for interoperability remedies from regulators. Have I > missed any? Specifically on this topic, I wonder if there would be value in proactively reaching out to the people working on such provisions. Not to claim that we have an answer to everything, but to make contact and get a sense of priorities. (I think this group is reasonably credible without having yet produced output.) This could help shape what we're working on. Two pieces of draft legislation come to mind here: ACCESS in the US and the DMA in Europe. We could start having some conversations there, and maybe get a sense of what their expectations are when the delegate responsibility for interoperation to (respectively) NIST and CEN. -- Robin Berjon VP Data Governance The New York Times Company
Received on Monday, 6 December 2021 14:54:19 UTC