On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com> wrote: > So in some respects I agree with Tony that Lightning is a tightly > integrated full-stack solution that is difficult to wrap your head around > entirely but I also think Lightning and ILP have different goals so it's > not actually fair to compare them. > > I think our current track of making sure that Lightning is usable as > network in an ILP-based network of networks is the right one. > Yeah, I apologize if I have compared Lightning and Interledger as if they're direct competitors. In the ILP space, they're definitely on separate layers. Lightning is a ledger-layer solution (along with, I would say, things like Cosmos and Polkadot)
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2017 22:26:04 UTC