W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Bitcoin as an ILP ledger

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:06:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_J5y7=57TF_Aj6CN2rGymidvOZUGo=9X=gHVSh_GFDnjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
Cc: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com>, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>, Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com>
I think there are a few folks working on getting a ledger plugin built for
the reference implementation. Given that there is now a live net [1] to
test against this should pick up steam.

Also, some feedback on this task[2] for listing ILP projects on the website
would be welcome!

[2] https://github.com/interledger/interledger.github.io/issues/28

On 17 January 2017 at 23:42, Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank David.
> Does anyone know if BIP-65 is sufficient for basic operation of Bitcoin
> and/or Lightning within ILP?
> On Jan 17, 2017 2:23 PM, "David Nicol" <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote:
>> the newly proposed timeout stuff (BIP-65) seems there to support basic
>> ILP requirements; I pointed this out for the specs, see
>> https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/commit/e156883fc7ab8b55
>> b7b933a90de10925822997ab
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com> wrote:
>>> Has anyone worked out how to incorporate Bitcoin (or Lightning) as a
>>> ledger in a multi-ledger ILP payment?  What scripting would be needed on
>>> the Bitcoin side, what would need to go into the ILP messages to properly
>>> trigger that script, etc.?  Has anyone actually tried this yet?  Thanks.
>> --
>> "Have you taken yourself seriously today?" -- the gravity clown
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 12:06:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 20 January 2017 12:06:40 UTC