W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Bitcoin as an ILP ledger

From: Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:42:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAB1OcyGUgj7hvdSc3o+bXyo7dPVhMNEPfjERhMChcA0o0gqy0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com>
Thank David.

Does anyone know if BIP-65 is sufficient for basic operation of Bitcoin
and/or Lightning within ILP?
On Jan 17, 2017 2:23 PM, "David Nicol" <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> the newly proposed timeout stuff (BIP-65) seems there to support basic ILP
> requirements; I pointed this out for the specs, see  https://github.com/
> interledger/rfcs/commit/e156883fc7ab8b55b7b933a90de10925822997ab
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone worked out how to incorporate Bitcoin (or Lightning) as a
>> ledger in a multi-ledger ILP payment?  What scripting would be needed on
>> the Bitcoin side, what would need to go into the ILP messages to properly
>> trigger that script, etc.?  Has anyone actually tried this yet?  Thanks.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Have you taken yourself seriously today?" -- the gravity clown
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 21:43:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 January 2017 21:43:09 UTC