Thank David. Does anyone know if BIP-65 is sufficient for basic operation of Bitcoin and/or Lightning within ILP? On Jan 17, 2017 2:23 PM, "David Nicol" <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote: > > the newly proposed timeout stuff (BIP-65) seems there to support basic ILP > requirements; I pointed this out for the specs, see https://github.com/ > interledger/rfcs/commit/e156883fc7ab8b55b7b933a90de10925822997ab > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone worked out how to incorporate Bitcoin (or Lightning) as a >> ledger in a multi-ledger ILP payment? What scripting would be needed on >> the Bitcoin side, what would need to go into the ILP messages to properly >> trigger that script, etc.? Has anyone actually tried this yet? Thanks. >> > > > > -- > "Have you taken yourself seriously today?" -- the gravity clown >
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 21:43:09 UTC