- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:56:38 +0100
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+eFz_K85kc7bUaW08PBRH9OJz6ePi3DHVwbxSiEahFw450QrA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Joseph, Xalgorithms did cross my mind as I was writing that post but I confess I haven't dug into it enough to be sure that it was a good fit. On 28 March 2016 at 16:04, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > RE: "the Interledger architecture is layered... there is scope for a more > complex and rich application layer protocol that is more targeted at > "enterprise" use cases" > > +1 > > RE; "to begin developing another application layer protocol that is > focused on B2B and leverages existing standards like ebXML. ISO20022 or UBL > then that would be great: > > In part, like this? > https://github.com/Xalgorithms/xa-arch/blob/master/README.md > https://www.xalgorithms.org/ > > > RE: It is a far larger task than the current group could take on but I'd > certainly support it and try to get involved as time allows. > > Xalgorithms Foundation (XF) has not yet been reaching out much. An initial > group is doing some grunt work to determine which specific functions we'll > target and how, and which parts are for others to do. i.e. Which the > internal functions of OSI Layer 7 can we enhance with the our two > contributions?) Our scope is much narrower than you described for Layer 7 > work, only some component parts. Some structure for our work is now getting > posted to Github. We haven't yet got much of any use for anyone to > download. At present we're creating a limited working proof-of-concept. > There's also a fully-scalable free/libre/open pathway in planning. > > Starting on 6 April at 2:30 EST, XF will be hosting an open-to-anyone 30 > min "Xalgorithms Tech Weekly Forum" on Google Hangout. I'll share details > shortly. > > Anyone with specific enquiries (which may be out-of-scope for this email > list) can contact me directly via jpotvin@xalgorithms.org > > Joseph Potvin > Executive Director, Xalgorithms Foundation > Mobile: 819-593-5983 > jpotvin@xalgorithms.org > https://www.xalgorithms.org > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com > > wrote: > >> From the discussion around payment to invoices there appears to be a >> number of views that the current application layer protocol is not meeting >> the needs of all B2B use cases. >> >> Further, there is a suggestion that there are a number of existing >> protocols and standards that we should be leveraging. >> >> It's important to note that the Interledger architecture is layered, >> intentionally, to resemble something like the OSI model for communications >> protocols. At the lowest layers are very simple protocols that have a >> specific purpose but these build up to an application layer where it is >> possible to construct a number of application layer protocols that are >> built on the lower layer primitives and fit for a particular purpose. >> >> I'd compare these to communications stack protocols like HTTP and FTP. >> These two protocols are built on the same underlying IP-based stacks but >> were designed for very different purposes. >> >> Right now OWPS is intended to be a very simple application layer protocol >> primarily designed to handle P2P payments or very simple C2B payments (i.e. >> 1:1 payment to invoice). It has very specific design principles which may >> not be appropriate for a lot of use cases (such as being operatorless). >> This protocol may evolve but it's unlikely to ever be a rich protocol that >> incorporates comprehensive stacks like ISO20022 or ebXML. >> >> Rather than trying to turn OWPS into a protocol that can handle all use >> cases I'd suggest there is scope for a more complex and rich application >> layer protocol that is more targeted at "enterprise" use cases. >> >> If there is a willingness within this group to begin developing another >> application layer protocol that is focused on B2B and leverages existing >> standards like ebXML. ISO20022 or UBL then that would be great. >> >> It is a far larger task than the current group could take on but I'd >> certainly support it and try to get involved as time allows. >> >> Adrian >> > >
Received on Monday, 28 March 2016 18:57:07 UTC