- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:56:08 +0100
- To: Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback@gmail.com>
- Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhL14u6GCzf5HkKwaC+B0YxpfZQJxQbj=waL_dsE9EPaxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 3 January 2016 at 20:36, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I recently presented my protocol, Universal Payment Channels, at CCC. > Afterwards, I met Evan Schwartz, who mentioned this group. > > UPC is a lot like Interledger, except that ledgers hold money in escrow > for an unlimited number of payments, instead of just one. > > The main effect of this is that ledgers are not involved in individual > payments. This has a large effect on scalability because a potentially > infinite number of payments can be exchanged between two connectors without > any involvement of a bank, or any data saved to a blockchain. In this way > it is similar to the bitcoin lightning network proposal. > > Also, individual payments can very fast, due to the non-involvement of the > ledgers. No confirmation time or bank systems to process individual > payments. > > Here's the paper if you're interested: > http://altheamesh.com/documents/universal-payment-channels.pdf > > I'm also working on a routing protocol for this, which could probably be > used with Interledger (or even Lightning) as well. It's based on AODV, and > preserves complete anonymity of sender and receiver at the cost of > somewhat-high network traffic. It was part of the above paper that some of > you may have seen but I've removed it from the current draft. I'll post > more about it later if anyone is interested. > Very nice! Pretty much what I have in mind too using webcredits. Hopefully implementation will be complete early this year. > > -Jehan >
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 01:56:42 UTC