- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:45:14 +0200
- To: Rafael Pereira <rafael@rippex.net>
- Cc: M AV <av_m@hotmail.com>, Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+eFz_JgUuqrJ5ihTGHL=KGc8BTzESEpOQqfOnfGrpFuzb0cMQ@mail.gmail.com>
It's called XMPP :) Some good lessons for the Interledger project from this: http://xmpp.org/about/history.html On 29 August 2016 at 19:38, Rafael Pereira <rafael@rippex.net> wrote: > Someone must develop SMTP for IMs :) > > Obrigado, > Rafael > > [image: Rippex - O Gateway Ripple do Brasil] > > *Rafael Olaio - CEO * > tel +55 11 2337.2225 > cel +55 11 99522.7572 > rippex.net > Esta mensagem pode conter informação confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se > você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, > não poderá usar, copiar ou divulgar as informações nela contidas ou tomar > qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Se você recebeu esta mensagem por > engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e > em seguida apague-o.This message may contain confidential and/or > privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to > receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take > any action based on this message or any information here in. If you have > received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by > reply e-mail and delete this message. > > 2016-08-29 14:33 GMT-03:00 Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>: > >> I polled the group about using Slack a while back and the general >> consensus was that they didn't want to use it and would prefer open tech >> like IRC. >> >> If you log into Gitter you'll be able to link it to a Slack channel if >> that's what you'd like to do. >> >> On 29 August 2016 at 18:27, M AV <av_m@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Any reason not considering Slack? >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Adrian Hope-Bailie [mailto:adrian@hopebailie.com] >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 5:57 AM >>> *To:* Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com> >>> *Cc:* Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: IRC and Gitter >>> >>> >>> >>> Update: Since the W3C IRC has no NickServ we can't use sameroom.io >>> which requires this :( >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29 August 2016 at 11:46, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> re: 'possibly host' : We can host it ourselves (I will see if Ripple can >>> sponsor this) or we can use a hosted service like sameroom.io. >>> >>> re cost: >>> - Sameroom.io = $49/month (5 channels), >>> - hosted = is cost of hosting and people to manage/setup >>> >>> >>> >>> On 26 August 2016 at 16:22, Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> For option 2, what is the cost of managing another service? And why is >>> it 'possibly host?' >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Aug 26, 2016 10:04 AM, "Adrian Hope-Bailie" <adrian@hopebailie.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have done some investigating and have two options for us with regard >>> to using Gitter but still offering IRC for those that prefer that channel. >>> >>> *Option 1: Switch to Gitter hosted IRC server* >>> >>> If you visit http://irc.gitter.im you'll see instructions for >>> connecting to a secure IRC server using a unique, per-user server key. >>> >>> Once you connect you'll be logged into an IRC channel for each Gitter >>> room and use the same Nick as your github username. >>> >>> Anything posted in either system is mirrored in the other. >>> >>> Pros: >>> >>> - Secure IRC >>> >>> - Tight integration with Gitter >>> >>> Cons: >>> >>> - Need to switch to a new IRC server >>> >>> - Lose the W3C IRC bots >>> >>> >>> >>> *Option 2: Setup a bridge between Gitter and W3C IRC* >>> >>> There are bots that can monitor both systems and mirror messages between >>> them. We can use https://sameroom.io or host a bot ourselves. >>> >>> Pros: >>> >>> - Keep same IRC server and channel >>> >>> >>> >>> Cons: >>> >>> - Need to manage (and possibly host) yet another service >>> >>> Anyone have any thoughts on these options? >>> >>> Adrian >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 29 August 2016 17:45:46 UTC