W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > August 2016

Re: IRC and Gitter

From: Rafael Pereira <rafael@rippex.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:38:52 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFk+OK=pJ6mo8HSFHWw=MXYBrpr1FSK5m3kpJUN=QDJBR2KHsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Cc: M AV <av_m@hotmail.com>, Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Someone must develop SMTP for IMs :)

Obrigado,
Rafael

[image: Rippex - O Gateway Ripple do Brasil]

*Rafael Olaio - CEO *
tel +55 11 2337.2225
cel +55 11 99522.7572
rippex.net
Esta mensagem pode conter informação confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se
você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem,
não poderá usar, copiar ou divulgar as informações nela contidas ou tomar
qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Se você recebeu esta mensagem por
engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e
em seguida apague-o.This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for
the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on
this message or any information here in. If you have received this message
in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete
this message.

2016-08-29 14:33 GMT-03:00 Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>:

> I polled the group about using Slack a while back and the general
> consensus was that they didn't want to use it and would prefer open tech
> like IRC.
>
> If you log into Gitter you'll be able to link it to a Slack channel if
> that's what you'd like to do.
>
> On 29 August 2016 at 18:27, M AV <av_m@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Any reason not considering Slack?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Adrian Hope-Bailie [mailto:adrian@hopebailie.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 5:57 AM
>> *To:* Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: IRC and Gitter
>>
>>
>>
>> Update: Since the W3C IRC has no NickServ we can't use sameroom.io which
>> requires this :(
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29 August 2016 at 11:46, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> re: 'possibly host' : We can host it ourselves (I will see if Ripple can
>> sponsor this) or we can use a hosted service like sameroom.io.
>>
>> re cost:
>> - Sameroom.io = $49/month (5 channels),
>> - hosted = is cost of hosting and people to manage/setup
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 August 2016 at 16:22, Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> For option 2, what is the cost of managing another service? And why is it
>> 'possibly host?'
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Aug 26, 2016 10:04 AM, "Adrian Hope-Bailie" <adrian@hopebailie.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have done some investigating and have two options for us with regard to
>> using Gitter but still offering IRC for those that prefer that channel.
>>
>> *Option 1: Switch to Gitter hosted IRC server*
>>
>> If you visit http://irc.gitter.im you'll see instructions for connecting
>> to a secure IRC server using a unique, per-user server key.
>>
>> Once you connect you'll be logged into an IRC channel for each Gitter
>> room and use the same Nick as your github username.
>>
>> Anything posted in either system is mirrored in the other.
>>
>> Pros:
>>
>> - Secure IRC
>>
>> - Tight integration with Gitter
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>> - Need to switch to a new IRC server
>>
>> - Lose the W3C IRC bots
>>
>>
>>
>> *Option 2: Setup a bridge between Gitter and W3C IRC*
>>
>> There are bots that can monitor both systems and mirror messages between
>> them. We can use https://sameroom.io or host a bot ourselves.
>>
>> Pros:
>>
>> - Keep same IRC server and channel
>>
>>
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>> - Need to manage (and possibly host) yet another service
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts on these options?
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 29 August 2016 17:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 August 2016 17:39:31 UTC