- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:16:54 +0700
- To: "public-appsdesignlab@w3.org" <public-appsdesignlab@w3.org>, "public-informationarchitecture@w3.org" <public-informationarchitecture@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKi_AEvvd_AzTskZ-+rGfwQNhZFnGuHuhFG9c9uaP7eCRt1oww@mail.gmail.com>
Dear public-appsdesignlab & public-informationarchitecture, "Communication Networks", "Information Networks", "Network Deconstruction", "Networks Recycling", the "Internet Web Ecology" and the "(World Wide) Web" --those I mentioned in the previous messages-- reminds me also on - "The Web of Life" by Fritjof Capra (1996) https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-web-of-life-a-new-scientific-un derstanding-of-living-systems-e157334927.html Reagard, Guntur Wiseno Putra Pada Senin, 25 April 2022, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> menulis: > Dear public-appsdesignlab & > public-informationarchitecture, > > > > Yet we may encounter critical situations of everyday lifes asking for > solutions, problems asking for conceptual solutions... (See Deleuze and > Guattari in "What is Philosophy? ch 1. "Concepts") I mentioned above): are > technologies not about "concepts with their implementations"? -- according > to Oxford English Dictionary (Green-Yellow Edition) "technology" means > 2. systematic application of knowledge to practical task in industry...? > > > As I am reading on it, the Deleuzo-Guattarian notion on "concept" is > deconstructive and thus has a similaritiy with Jacques Derrida's, Michel > Foucault's and what is known as the Bootstraap hypothesis/philosophy in > physics attempted by Geoffrey Chan: > > This one may render ones to thinking on deconstructive concepts. Is the > Deleuzo-Guattarian notion on "concept" not about a notion on deconstructive > concepts (which are of cocepts that have histories and "becomings"; of ones > having heterogen yet inseparable components; of ones as points of > connections, condensation and associations of their components, as > heterogenesis and ordinals)... > > > > "What is called "deconstruction"--and I will be very sketchy here, because > time does > not permit detailed analyses--has never, never opposed institutions as > such, > philosophy as such, discipline as such. Nevertheless, as you rightly said, > it is another > thing for me to be doing what I am doing here. Because, however affirmative > deconstruction is, it is affirmative in a way that is not simply positive, > not simply > conservative, not simply a way of repeating the given institution. I think > that the life of an institution implies that we are able to criticize, to > transform, to > open the institution to its own future. The paradox in the instituting > moment of an > institution is that, at the same time that it starts something new, it > also continues > something, is true to the memory of the past, to a heritage, to something > we receive > from the past, from our predecessors, from the culture. If an institution > is to be an > institution, it must to some extent break with the past, keep the memory > of the past, > while inaugurating something absolutely new [cf. PdS139/ Points130-131]. > So, I am > convinced that today, although ((a ))program to some extent looks like > other, similar > programs, it does something absolutely new. The indication of this is > found not > simply in the structural organization of the program, but in the work, in > the content of > the work, of those who will run this program, the new themes. (()) they > are not simply reproducing, that they are trying to open something new and > something > original, something that hasn't been done in that way in other, similar > ((places)) or > programs. So the paradox is that the instituting moment in an institution > is violent in a > way, violent because it has no guarantee. Although it follows the premises > of the past, > it starts something absolutely new, and this newness, this novelty, is a > risk, is > something that has to be risky, and it is violent because it is guaranteed > by no > previous rules. So, at the same time, you have to follow the rule and to > invent a new > rule, a new norm, a new criterion, a new law [cf. FL 50-52/ DPJ23]. That's > why the > moment of institution is so dangerous at the same time. One should not > have an > absolute guarantee, an absolute norm; we have to invent the rules. I am > sure that the > responsibility that is taken ((ones working on a program)) implies that > they > give themselves the new rule. There is no responsibility, no decision, > without this > inauguration, this absolute break. That is what deconstruction is made of: > not the > mixture but the tension between memory, fidelity, the preservation of > something that > has been given to us, and, at the same time, heterogeneity, something > absolutely new, > and a break. The condition of this performative success, which is never > guaranteed, is > the alliance of these to newness". > > (Caputo, J.D (ed.), "Deconstruction in a Nutshell: a Conversation with > Jacques Derrida" > https://www.pdfdrive.com/deconstruction-in-a-nutshell-a-conv > ersation-with-jacques-derrida-e161901356.html > The sign ((...)) means that I made such an editing.) > > > Yet, Foucault's archaelogy of human sciences worked on such a notion on > cultutalbdeconstruction when dealingveith "order", "reflections on order" > and "pure experiences of order". He also finded out that 17th-18th century > episteme, which was of "representation", was featured by such a thought > which is of deconstruction: "An arbitrary system of signs must permit > analysis of things into their simplest elements; it must be capable of > decomposing them into their very origins; but it must also demonstrate how > combinations of those elements are possible, and permit the ideal genesis > of the complexity of things".(My machine-based notes on) Foucault, M., The > Order of Things: an Archaeology of Human Sciences" Chapter 3. > "Representing" p. 68-9 (It is also availabe in PDF Drive library > https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-order-of-things-routledge-class > ics-e184283457.html) > > Fritjof Capra, "The Tao of Physics" > https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-tao-of-physics-an-exploration-o > f-the-parallels-between-modern-physics-and-eastern-mysticism > -e195269411.html > or > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/ > /rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DDM110%2520CAS/C > apra-1975%2520The%2520Tao%2520of%2520Physics.pdf&ved=2ahUKEw > iHlpn5ycfzAhVLILcAHdNXBn8QFnoECAoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0L14GlSrtyULe > RrbOMmYPGRegard, > and Capra " The Unification of Physics" > http://www.fritjofcapra.net/the-unification-of-physics/ > > > "Communication Networks", "Information Networks", "Network > Deconstruction", "Networks Recycling"...? > "Recycling" is the term closely related with ecology, yet may also in such > an anticipation for "The Internet Web ecology"*1. "Recycling" means > "reprocessing of recovered materials at the end of product life, returning > them into the supply chain ("Handbook of Recycling..." p.9). > https://www.pdfdrive.com/handbook-of-recycling-state-of-the- > art-for-practitioners-analysts-and-scientists-e165930045.html > > > > NOTE: > > *1 > > "Before your personal computer is turned on, it is a dead collection of > sheet metal, plastic, > metallic tracings, and tiny flakes of silicon. When you push the On > switch, one little burst of elec- > tricity-only about 3-5 volts-starts a string of events that magically > brings to life what otherwise > would remain an oversized paperweight". > > "How Computers Work" (By R. White & T. Down, Que, 8th Edition). Part 7 > "How the Internet Works": > > https://www.pdfdrive.com/how-computers-work-8th-edition-e33422809.html > > > > "The Internet works because of interoperability between different > computers, despite different hardware, operating systems, local language > context, and software supplier. Users of the web sign on to the use of > these languages when they use the Internet". (T. Berners-Lee, "Stack of > Specifications") > > https://w3.org/DesignIssues/Stack.html > > > > > > Regard, > Guntur Wiseno Putra > > Pada Selasa, 29 Maret 2022, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> > menulis: > >> Dear Noreen, >> public-appsdesignlab & >> public-informationarchitecture >> >> >> Such convergences of events: >> >> *) The episteme and epistemological rupture, *) the field of discursive >> events, *) discursive formations and positivities, *) epistemological >> extrapolation and genetic extrapolation >> >> "On the Archaeology of the Sciences: Response to the Epistenology Circle >> in "Michel Foucault: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 Vol. 2 >> Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology"" ed. J. Faubion (Penguin Books, 2000) >> p.297-333 (I have not found it yet in the PDF Library.) >> >> But simply, again using Foucault'words, the reading on such convergences >> of events is about "...addressing >> itself to the general space of knowledge, to its configurations, and to >> the mode of being of the things that appear in it, defines systems of >> simultaneity, as well as the series of mutations necessary and sufficient >> to circumscribe the threshold of a new positivity". (See "The Order of >> Things" p.xxv >> https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-order-of-things-routledge-class >> ics-e184283457.html) >> >> Therefore there may be ones in our day like "Les Meninas" and "Don >> Quixote" for the classical period of "representation" signing the 17th >> century Europe (See "The Order of Things" pp. 3-19 and pp. 51-55) . Yet we >> may encounter critical situations of everyday lifes asking for solutions, >> problems asking for conceptual solutions... (See Deleuze and Guattari in >> "What is Philosophy? ch 1. "Concepts") I mentioned above): are technologies >> not about concept with their implemetations? >> >> >> >> Somewhere the Internet Web, which is only part of a global human society, >> there are supposedly an event, or set of collected events, working for such >> inventions/discoveries/innovations --of the Internet Web and a global >> human society... >> >> >> Regard, >> Guntur Wiseno Putra >> >> Pada Senin, 28 Maret 2022, Noreen Whysel <nwhysel@gmail.com> menulis: >> >>> Thank you, Gunter. This is a fascinating list of convergences between >>> IA, Design, Architecture and philosophy. >>> >>> Noreen >>> >>> On Mar 27, 2022, at 10:21 PM, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear publicappsdesignlab & >>> public-informationarchitecture >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Architecture": art and science of building (Oxford English Dictionary >>> (Green-Yellow Edition)): The Website is architectural: designing the Web >>> which is architectural: >>> >>> These are how public-appsdesignlab and informationarchitecture Community >>> Groups of the W3C meet according to J.N. Robbins'"Learning Web Design..." >>> (O'Reilly, 2018) >>> >>> "IT TAKES A VILLAGE >>> (WEBSITE CREATION ROLES) >>> When I look at a site, I see the multitude of decisions and areas of >>> expertise >>> that went into building it...". >>> p.4 >>> >>> More about the Web there is a linkage between Information Architecture >>> and Design: >>> >>> "... the various disciplines that contribute >>> to the creation of a site, including roles related to content, design, >>> and code.... >>> >>> *) Content Wrangling >>> Anyone who uses the title “web designer” needs to be aware that >>> everything >>> we do supports the process of getting the content, message, or >>> functionality >>> to our users. >>> >>> ... two content-related specialists in modern web development: the >>> Information Architect (IA) and the Content Strategist. >>> >>> 1) Information architecture >>> An Information Architect (also called an Information Designer) organizes >>> the content logically and for ease of findability. They may be >>> responsible >>> for search functionality, site diagrams, and how the content and data are >>> organized on the server. Information architecture is inevitably entwined >>> with >>> UX and UI design (defined shortly) as well as content management. If you >>> like organizing or are gaga for taxonomies, information architecture may >>> be >>> the job for you. The definitive text for this field as it relates to the >>> web is >>> Information Architecture: For the Web and Beyond, by Louis Rosenfeld and >>> Peter Morville (O’Reilly). >>> >>> 2) Content strategy >>> A Content Strategist makes sure that every bit of text on a site, from >>> long explanatory >>> text down to the labels on buttons, supports the brand identity and mar- >>> keting goals of the organization. Content strategy may also extend to >>> data >>> modeling and content management on a large and ongoing scale, such as >>> planning for content reuse and update schedules. Their responsibilities >>> may >>> also include how the organization’s voice is represented on social >>> media. A >>> good place to learn more is the book Content Strategy for the Web, 2nd >>> Edition, >>> by Kristina Halvorson and Melissa Rich (New Riders). >>> ... >>> >>> **) All Manner of Design >>> Ah, design! It sounds fairly straightforward, but even this simple >>> requirement >>> has been divided into a number of specializations when it comes to >>> creating >>> sites. >>> >>> - User Experience, Interaction, and User Interface design >>> ... (User research and testing reports, Wireframe diagrams, Site >>> diagram, Storyboards and user flow charts) ... >>> - Visual (graphic) design >>> >>> >>> ***) Code Slinging >>> - Frontend development (Authoring/markup (HTML), Styling (CSS), >>> JavaScript and DOM scripting) >>> - Backend development >>> >>> ****) Other Roles >>> - Product manager >>> - Project manager >>> - SEO (Search Engine Optimization) specialist >>> - Multimedia producers >>> >>> ..." >>> >>> p.4-13 (J.N.Robbins, "Learning Web Design"...) >>> >>> It reminds me on T. Berners-Lee's "Design Issues: Architectural and >>> Philosophical Points" >>> >>> "Architectural and philosophical points >>> These statements of architectural principle explain the thinking behind >>> the specifications. These are personal notes by Tim Berners-Lee: they are >>> not endorsed by W3C. They are aimed at the technical community, to explain >>> reasons, provide a framework to provide consistency for for future >>> developments, and avoid repetition of discussions once resolved". >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Preface.html >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ >>> >>> and on "Caught in a Web (Awake)" · Dream Theater (1994) >>> >>> There are at least --as I could not catch the words clearly >>> >>> "Caught in a web, looked from the (world!?). Hanging out by threads ..." >>> >>> https://youtu.be/j_hg6NFab-k >>> >>> A musical composition is also architectural: "architecture" is about >>> "framing": >>> >>> "The situation of music seems no different and perhaps em- >>> bodies the frame even more powerfully. Yet it is said that >>> sound has no frame. But compounds of sensation, sonorous >>> blocs, equally possess sections or framing fonns each of >>> which must join together to secure a certain closing-off...". >>> >>> (G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, "What is Philosophy" p. 189-91) >>> >>> https://www.pdfdrive.com/what-is-philosophy-e184603896.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regard, >>> Guntur Wiseno Putra >>> >>>
Received on Monday, 25 April 2022 15:17:09 UTC