- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:04:04 +0700
- To: "public-appsdesignlab@w3.org" <public-appsdesignlab@w3.org>, "public-informationarchitecture@w3.org" <public-informationarchitecture@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKi_AEtbLHwW+E+ggvRcy-m1=Asmw=ZS20wuZPXOPCTASWGf1g@mail.gmail.com>
Dear public-appsdesignlab & public-informationarchitecture, Yet we may encounter critical situations of everyday lifes asking for solutions, problems asking for conceptual solutions... (See Deleuze and Guattari in "What is Philosophy? ch 1. "Concepts") I mentioned above): are technologies not about "concepts with their implementations"? -- according to Oxford English Dictionary (Green-Yellow Edition) "technology" means 2. systematic application of knowledge to practical task in industry...? As I am reading on it, the Deleuzo-Guattarian notion on "concept" is deconstructive and thus has a similaritiy with Jacques Derrida's, Michel Foucault's and what is known as the Bootstraap hypothesis/philosophy in physics attempted by Geoffrey Chan: This one may render ones to thinking on deconstructive concepts. Is the Deleuzo-Guattarian notion on "concept" not about a notion on deconstructive concepts (which are of cocepts that have histories and "becomings"; of ones having heterogen yet inseparable components; of ones as points of connections, condensation and associations of their components, as heterogenesis and ordinals)... "What is called "deconstruction"--and I will be very sketchy here, because time does not permit detailed analyses--has never, never opposed institutions as such, philosophy as such, discipline as such. Nevertheless, as you rightly said, it is another thing for me to be doing what I am doing here. Because, however affirmative deconstruction is, it is affirmative in a way that is not simply positive, not simply conservative, not simply a way of repeating the given institution. I think that the life of an institution implies that we are able to criticize, to transform, to open the institution to its own future. The paradox in the instituting moment of an institution is that, at the same time that it starts something new, it also continues something, is true to the memory of the past, to a heritage, to something we receive from the past, from our predecessors, from the culture. If an institution is to be an institution, it must to some extent break with the past, keep the memory of the past, while inaugurating something absolutely new [cf. PdS139/ Points130-131]. So, I am convinced that today, although ((a ))program to some extent looks like other, similar programs, it does something absolutely new. The indication of this is found not simply in the structural organization of the program, but in the work, in the content of the work, of those who will run this program, the new themes. (()) they are not simply reproducing, that they are trying to open something new and something original, something that hasn't been done in that way in other, similar ((places)) or programs. So the paradox is that the instituting moment in an institution is violent in a way, violent because it has no guarantee. Although it follows the premises of the past, it starts something absolutely new, and this newness, this novelty, is a risk, is something that has to be risky, and it is violent because it is guaranteed by no previous rules. So, at the same time, you have to follow the rule and to invent a new rule, a new norm, a new criterion, a new law [cf. FL 50-52/ DPJ23]. That's why the moment of institution is so dangerous at the same time. One should not have an absolute guarantee, an absolute norm; we have to invent the rules. I am sure that the responsibility that is taken ((ones working on a program)) implies that they give themselves the new rule. There is no responsibility, no decision, without this inauguration, this absolute break. That is what deconstruction is made of: not the mixture but the tension between memory, fidelity, the preservation of something that has been given to us, and, at the same time, heterogeneity, something absolutely new, and a break. The condition of this performative success, which is never guaranteed, is the alliance of these to newness". (Caputo, J.D (ed.), "Deconstruction in a Nutshell: a Conversation with Jacques Derrida" https://www.pdfdrive.com/deconstruction-in-a-nutshell-a-conv ersation-with-jacques-derrida-e161901356.html The sign ((...)) means that I made such an editing.) Yet, Foucault's archaelogy of human sciences worked on such a notion on cultutalbdeconstruction when dealingveith "order", "reflections on order" and "pure experiences of order". He also finded out that 17th-18th century episteme, which was of "representation", was featured by such a thought which is of deconstruction: "An arbitrary system of signs must permit analysis of things into their simplest elements; it must be capable of decomposing them into their very origins; but it must also demonstrate how combinations of those elements are possible, and permit the ideal genesis of the complexity of things".(My machine-based notes on) Foucault, M., The Order of Things: an Archaeology of Human Sciences" Chapter 3. "Representing" p. 68-9 (It is also availabe in PDF Drive library https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-order-of-things-routledge-class ics-e184283457.html) Fritjof Capra, "The Tao of Physics" https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-tao-of-physics-an-exploration-o f-the-parallels-between-modern-physics-and-eastern-mysticism-e195269411.html or https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/ /rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DDM110%2520CAS/C apra-1975%2520The%2520Tao%2520of%2520Physics.pdf&ved=2ahUKEw iHlpn5ycfzAhVLILcAHdNXBn8QFnoECAoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0L14GlSrtyULeRrbOMmYPGRegard, and Capra " The Unification of Physics" http://www.fritjofcapra.net/the-unification-of-physics/ "Communication Networks", "Information Networks", "Network Deconstruction", "Networks Recycling"...? "Recycling" is the term closely related with ecology, yet may also in such an anticipation for "The Internet Web ecology"*1. "Recycling" means "reprocessing of recovered materials at the end of product life, returning them into the supply chain ("Handbook of Recycling..." p.9). https://www.pdfdrive.com/handbook-of-recycling-state-of-the- art-for-practitioners-analysts-and-scientists-e165930045.html NOTE: *1 "Before your personal computer is turned on, it is a dead collection of sheet metal, plastic, metallic tracings, and tiny flakes of silicon. When you push the On switch, one little burst of elec- tricity-only about 3-5 volts-starts a string of events that magically brings to life what otherwise would remain an oversized paperweight". "How Computers Work" (By R. White & T. Down, Que, 8th Edition). Part 7 "How the Internet Works": https://www.pdfdrive.com/how-computers-work-8th-edition-e33422809.html "The Internet works because of interoperability between different computers, despite different hardware, operating systems, local language context, and software supplier. Users of the web sign on to the use of these languages when they use the Internet". (T. Berners-Lee, "Stack of Specifications") https://w3.org/DesignIssues/Stack.html Regard, Guntur Wiseno Putra Pada Selasa, 29 Maret 2022, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> menulis: > Dear Noreen, > public-appsdesignlab & > public-informationarchitecture > > > Such convergences of events: > > *) The episteme and epistemological rupture, *) the field of discursive > events, *) discursive formations and positivities, *) epistemological > extrapolation and genetic extrapolation > > "On the Archaeology of the Sciences: Response to the Epistenology Circle > in "Michel Foucault: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 Vol. 2 > Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology"" ed. J. Faubion (Penguin Books, 2000) > p.297-333 (I have not found it yet in the PDF Library.) > > But simply, again using Foucault'words, the reading on such convergences > of events is about "...addressing > itself to the general space of knowledge, to its configurations, and to > the mode of being of the things that appear in it, defines systems of > simultaneity, as well as the series of mutations necessary and sufficient > to circumscribe the threshold of a new positivity". (See "The Order of > Things" p.xxv > https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-order-of-things-routledge-class > ics-e184283457.html) > > Therefore there may be ones in our day like "Les Meninas" and "Don > Quixote" for the classical period of "representation" signing the 17th > century Europe (See "The Order of Things" pp. 3-19 and pp. 51-55) . Yet we > may encounter critical situations of everyday lifes asking for solutions, > problems asking for conceptual solutions... (See Deleuze and Guattari in > "What is Philosophy? ch 1. "Concepts") I mentioned above): are technologies > not about concept with their implemetations? > > > > Somewhere the Internet Web, which is only part of a global human society, > there are supposedly an event, or set of collected events, working for such > inventions/discoveries/innovations --of the Internet Web and a global > human society... > > > Regard, > Guntur Wiseno Putra > > Pada Senin, 28 Maret 2022, Noreen Whysel <nwhysel@gmail.com> menulis: > >> Thank you, Gunter. This is a fascinating list of convergences between IA, >> Design, Architecture and philosophy. >> >> Noreen >> >> On Mar 27, 2022, at 10:21 PM, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Dear publicappsdesignlab & >> public-informationarchitecture >> >> >> >> >> "Architecture": art and science of building (Oxford English Dictionary >> (Green-Yellow Edition)): The Website is architectural: designing the Web >> which is architectural: >> >> These are how public-appsdesignlab and informationarchitecture Community >> Groups of the W3C meet according to J.N. Robbins'"Learning Web Design..." >> (O'Reilly, 2018) >> >> "IT TAKES A VILLAGE >> (WEBSITE CREATION ROLES) >> When I look at a site, I see the multitude of decisions and areas of >> expertise >> that went into building it...". >> p.4 >> >> More about the Web there is a linkage between Information Architecture >> and Design: >> >> "... the various disciplines that contribute >> to the creation of a site, including roles related to content, design, >> and code.... >> >> *) Content Wrangling >> Anyone who uses the title “web designer” needs to be aware that everything >> we do supports the process of getting the content, message, or >> functionality >> to our users. >> >> ... two content-related specialists in modern web development: the >> Information Architect (IA) and the Content Strategist. >> >> 1) Information architecture >> An Information Architect (also called an Information Designer) organizes >> the content logically and for ease of findability. They may be responsible >> for search functionality, site diagrams, and how the content and data are >> organized on the server. Information architecture is inevitably entwined >> with >> UX and UI design (defined shortly) as well as content management. If you >> like organizing or are gaga for taxonomies, information architecture may >> be >> the job for you. The definitive text for this field as it relates to the >> web is >> Information Architecture: For the Web and Beyond, by Louis Rosenfeld and >> Peter Morville (O’Reilly). >> >> 2) Content strategy >> A Content Strategist makes sure that every bit of text on a site, from >> long explanatory >> text down to the labels on buttons, supports the brand identity and mar- >> keting goals of the organization. Content strategy may also extend to data >> modeling and content management on a large and ongoing scale, such as >> planning for content reuse and update schedules. Their responsibilities >> may >> also include how the organization’s voice is represented on social media. >> A >> good place to learn more is the book Content Strategy for the Web, 2nd >> Edition, >> by Kristina Halvorson and Melissa Rich (New Riders). >> ... >> >> **) All Manner of Design >> Ah, design! It sounds fairly straightforward, but even this simple >> requirement >> has been divided into a number of specializations when it comes to >> creating >> sites. >> >> - User Experience, Interaction, and User Interface design >> ... (User research and testing reports, Wireframe diagrams, Site diagram, >> Storyboards and user flow charts) ... >> - Visual (graphic) design >> >> >> ***) Code Slinging >> - Frontend development (Authoring/markup (HTML), Styling (CSS), >> JavaScript and DOM scripting) >> - Backend development >> >> ****) Other Roles >> - Product manager >> - Project manager >> - SEO (Search Engine Optimization) specialist >> - Multimedia producers >> >> ..." >> >> p.4-13 (J.N.Robbins, "Learning Web Design"...) >> >> It reminds me on T. Berners-Lee's "Design Issues: Architectural and >> Philosophical Points" >> >> "Architectural and philosophical points >> These statements of architectural principle explain the thinking behind >> the specifications. These are personal notes by Tim Berners-Lee: they are >> not endorsed by W3C. They are aimed at the technical community, to explain >> reasons, provide a framework to provide consistency for for future >> developments, and avoid repetition of discussions once resolved". >> >> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Preface.html >> >> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ >> >> and on "Caught in a Web (Awake)" · Dream Theater (1994) >> >> There are at least --as I could not catch the words clearly >> >> "Caught in a web, looked from the (world!?). Hanging out by threads ..." >> >> https://youtu.be/j_hg6NFab-k >> >> A musical composition is also architectural: "architecture" is about >> "framing": >> >> "The situation of music seems no different and perhaps em- >> bodies the frame even more powerfully. Yet it is said that >> sound has no frame. But compounds of sensation, sonorous >> blocs, equally possess sections or framing fonns each of >> which must join together to secure a certain closing-off...". >> >> (G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, "What is Philosophy" p. 189-91) >> >> https://www.pdfdrive.com/what-is-philosophy-e184603896.html >> >> >> >> >> >> Regard, >> Guntur Wiseno Putra >> >>
Received on Monday, 25 April 2022 14:04:19 UTC