- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:34:53 -0700
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: Indie UI <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Ted O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, "David (Standards) Singer" <singer@apple.com>
I've re-read this a few times, and I'm pretty sure none of the choices represent my preferred outcome, which is summarized here. 1. Some aspects of each spec go to different working groups. - User Context Media Features to CSS - User Context Security Model to CSS or another group. - Events and API either to WebApps or possibly HTML/DOM WG. The fate of Events potentially depends on the outcome of the WebApps Editing TF. A transfer of IndieUI events probably should not happen until after TPAC 2015. 2. Some aspects may be continued by a WAI WG, CG, or IG. - Schema.org taxonomy extension. - Additoinal use case documentation. 3. The IndieUI WG Charter should be briefly extended to allow heartbeat publishing and other proof-of-concept work in the near term. > On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:20 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > > I find this survey incredibly difficult to parse. By the time I finish reading the sub-level implications of each choice combination, I'm no longer certain which combination I prefer, or even if there is a combination that is desirable. Given the complexities of the combined choices, I think the results may be equally difficult to understand. > > I propose a new survey with 4 questions, each a freeform answer: > > 1. What should happen to IndieUI Events? > 2. What should happen to IndieUI User Context? > 3. What should happen to any additional work maintained by the IndieUI WG? > 4. Should IndieUI WG be rechartered? > > > >> On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: >> >> Colleagues: >> >> We are requesting your responses to a second >> WBS survey poll exploring support for various options for IndieUI >> after the end of its current charter period (which is this Thursday, April 30). >> >> Each option in this survey proposes actions for the Events and User >> Context deliverables, and the working Group as a whole. Please consider >> your level of support for the set of actions together in each question. >> The goal is to find an overall plan that is supported, even when >> components of the plan are not everybody's preferred option. >> >> Please respond to this survey before our regularly scheduled >> teleconference this coming Wednesday, if at all possible. The survey is >> available at: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/54997/201504_fate/ >> >> While the previous survey explored support for various individual >> options, it has been difficult to find overall support for a given >> combination. We hope to clarify preferences via this second survey. >> >> Thank you for your responses on such short notice! >> >> Janina >> >> >> -- >> >> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 >> sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net >> Email: janina@rednote.net >> >> Linux Foundation Fellow >> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org >> >> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) >> Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf >> Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ >> >> >
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 23:35:23 UTC