- From: Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:31:57 +0900
- To: public-indie-ui@w3.org, "Jason White" <jason@jasonjgw.net>
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:13:13 +0900, Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote: > Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote: > >> It has been proposed that the version identifier be dropped as a >> containing folder. I don't yet have the knowledge of Mercurial to >> understand if we can maintain a clear relationship between branches and >> W3C versions. > > I am much more familiar with Git than with Mercurial, though they are > similar > in broad outline. > > A further issue to consider is whether scripts are executed when a > commit is > made that update the editor's draft on the W3C site, and, more > generally, how > the repository is tied to the W3C's publication process. This may affect > branch structure, e.g., if commits made to the master branch result in > automatic publication within working group Web space, which is how the > W3C's > CVS repository used to work when I was an editor. If you create a named branch that corresponds to the W3C version, it should be accessible using the following URL syntax: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/[repository_name]/raw-file/[branch_name]/[filename] As a example, Touch Events Version 1 can be accessed with the following URL: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html (I can help with the branch setup after a draft is in place if needed) -- Sangwhan Moon, Opera Software ASA "Sent from my computer"
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 05:32:45 UTC