- From: J. Alan Bird <abird@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:58:23 -0500
- To: r12a <ishida@w3.org>, public-india-i18n-programme@w3.org
On 11/21/2017 10:49, r12a wrote: > On 19/11/2017 02:54, J. Alan Bird wrote: >> There is an "Indic Language" set of data in this presentation >> that was my best guess based on the Language Matrix that you have >> pointed me to. I attached the .xls file that is the summary for >> me. I also think that we need to be able to make your updated slides >> and the Project Plan World Readable so that we can move things to the >> next level of detail should discussions warrant. > > hi Alan, > > The spreadsheet has a few odd things going on, but i think that the > bottom line is that slide 9, which appears to indicate that we're > actually doing really well, ignores that: > > 1. the data we do have is not validated So that point needs to be made more clearly - thx > > 2. there are many categories across the languages where we have > question marks. agree > > > > These points lead to two things: > > 1. Slide 9 shows statistics that don't really have much to do with > reality. So what I'm trying to do with slides 8, 9 and 10 is take it from "the big list" of 72 to whatever number is relevant for India and to identify the key things that need to be done for Indic languages > > 2. It also misses the point that we actually have a lot of > investigative work and requirements development to do, as part of the > overall brief. It's not until we've done that that we can start moving > the 38% of the languages to Advanced (or whatever the real percentages > are). exact > > > I think it may help to use a customised version of the the matrix > instead - showing just the Indic languages. I can produce that for you > if you like? That would be awesome > > ri > > > -- J. Alan Bird W3C Global Business Development Leader office +1 617 253 7823 mobile +1 978 335 0537 abird@w3.org twitter @jalanbird
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2017 15:58:30 UTC