- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:49:07 +0000
- To: "J. Alan Bird" <abird@w3.org>, public-india-i18n-programme@w3.org
On 19/11/2017 02:54, J. Alan Bird wrote: > There is an "Indic Language" set of data in this presentation that > was my best guess based on the Language Matrix that you have pointed me > to. I attached the .xls file that is the summary for me. I also think > that we need to be able to make your updated slides and the Project Plan > World Readable so that we can move things to the next level of detail > should discussions warrant. hi Alan, The spreadsheet has a few odd things going on, but i think that the bottom line is that slide 9, which appears to indicate that we're actually doing really well, ignores that: 1. the data we do have is not validated 2. there are many categories across the languages where we have question marks. These points lead to two things: 1. Slide 9 shows statistics that don't really have much to do with reality. 2. It also misses the point that we actually have a lot of investigative work and requirements development to do, as part of the overall brief. It's not until we've done that that we can start moving the 38% of the languages to Advanced (or whatever the real percentages are). I think it may help to use a customised version of the the matrix instead - showing just the Indic languages. I can produce that for you if you like? ri
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2017 15:49:20 UTC