Re: Recap of TPAC discussion

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Cyril Concolato
<cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those who were not present during yesterday's TPAC session, here are the
> minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/2013/11/13-inbandtracks-minutes.html
>
> In summary, what I reported during the plenary was:
> - good discussion, lots of participants (26)
> - scope:  we agreed to make the scope as large as possible, covering all
> media 'container' formats (MP4, Matroska/WebM, MPEG-2, RTP, DASH, HLS, ...),
> but we will work only on formats for which we have actual contributions.
> - tasks: we agreed to work on the following (in the order of priority)
> 1. Mapping of container metadata (e.g. descriptors, ...) onto HTML Tracks
> interfaces
> 2. Mapping of media tracks onto HTML Tracks interfaces
> 3. Improving the use of media track data by JS applications, in particular
> regarding synchronization

I don't understand the difference between point 1 and 2 or what point
3 actually means, can you elaborate a little bit?

Philip

Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 07:46:33 UTC